Skip to Main Content
Data services feedback portal

Welcome to our feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about CONNECT products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the CONNECT product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for CONNECT data services. For links to our other feedback portals, please see RESOURCES below.

Status No status
Categories General
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 25, 2025

Egress via AF SDK

Please add AF SDK Egress as an additional optional egress component. This would be very helpful for customers who are using the adapters, but keeping the PI Server on-premise.


The adapters are relatively light-weight services; however, the “cost” of egressing data via OMF to an on-premise PI Server is that there is additional complexity introduced for receiving data:

1) Each WebAPI seems only able to receive data from five adapters, and each WebAPI requires 4 core and 8GB RAM. This has a significant cost attached, both OPEX and CAPEX.

2) Additional complexity to set up a load balancer in front of all the WebAPI machines

3) Data flow is Adapter buffer --> OMF egress to WebAPI --> pibufss (using AF SDK) --> PI Data Archive. This could be simplified if the adapter buffer can be cleared directly to pibufss using AF SDK without requiring the use of OMF in the middle. This may improve data throughput by utilising PINET to transfer the data instead of HTTPS which suffers badly over high latency connections.


The implementation difficulty currently is that pibufss and AF SDK are both not cross-platform. With AF SDK migrating to the latest .NET Core, that may change. Since the adapter has its buffer mechanism, the main utility of pibufss would be to manage the data fanning to multiple members of the PI collective. It may be possible to manage the fanning in the adapter's own buffer mechanism and pibufss would not be used at all.

  • Attach files